The Supreme Court last week quietly issued an unanimous decision upholding Fourth Amendment protections for passengers in stopped cars. The Court held that a passenger in a car is considered “seized” – an important determination that triggers Fourth Amendment protections against unlawful searches and seizures.
The opinion aligns with common sense and is not remarkable in many respects. But, the unanimous decision does indicate that, even in a court that tends towards stripping rights away, there are firm lines will not be crossed.
Read Similar ...
Lower Manhattan Security Initiative Rolls Forward by Boarder on July 9th, 2007
The "Special Needs" Exception to the Fourth Amendment and Antiterrorism Programs by Cato on May 14th, 2007
Democratic Divisions on Terrorism by Cato on August 30th, 2007
Deconstructing the German Terrorist Plot by Cato on September 6th, 2007
The Dangers of Myth by Cato on August 5th, 2007
The Man in Cheney's Shadow and Unilateral Executive Action by Cato on September 7th, 2007