Supreme Court Abortion Ruling Begins to Be Felt

The supreme court decision last month to uphold a federal ban on partial birth abortions (Gonzales vs Carhart) is beginning to populate the legal landscape, already suggesting the effects it will have on states’ laws regarding abortion.

States are now free to experiment with all kinds of pre-abortion requirements, including anti-abortion messages, psychological counseling, and mandatory waiting periods. As long as a new regulation isn’t considered an “undue burden” on the majority of women, it will likely survive.

In his 39-page majority opinion, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote, “The state’s interest in respect for life is advanced by the dialogue that better informs the political and legal systems, the medical profession, expectant mothers and society as a whole of the consequences that follow from a decision to elect a late-term abortion.”

It is reasonable to expect most of this “dialogue” to be shaped by pro-life partisans.

Read Similar ...

No Standing for Private Citizens by Cato on June 27th, 2007

Close Supreme Court Rulings Suggest Politics, Not Justice by Boarder on June 30th, 2007

Guantanamo Prisoners May Appeal Before Civilian Judges by Boarder on June 29th, 2007

Righting the Wrongs of Pay Discrimination by Cato on August 1st, 2007

"Bong Hits 4 Jesus," Just Not At School by Boarder on June 25th, 2007

Supreme Court Protects Criminal Defendants by Cato on June 24th, 2007

Speech Still Free For Those Who Can Pay For It by Cato on June 25th, 2007